Click here to skip navigation American Public Transportation Association Visit the APTA Bookstore
My APTA
What's New
About APTA
For Members
Committees
Conferences & Calendar
Services & Programs
Government Affairs
Industry Information
APTA Standards Program
Media Center
e-Business
Passenger Transport
Book Store
Links
Contact Us
Site Map
Home
Rail and Bus LinksThe Rail Station
September 06, 2008
APTA    Search: Click here to search
APTA > About APTA > APTA Committees > Passenger Rail Equipment Safety Standards Task Force > PRESS Bulletins  

APTA Passenger Rail Equipment Safety Standards Task Force Technical Bulletin 1998-1, Part 2

 IV. Technical Background 

The basis for this bulletin is the commonly accepted use of the Nadal formula which considers the influence of wheel flange angle, wheel/rail coefficient of friction and wheel/rail forces on the possibility of wheel climb derailment. This principle is expressed in the following Nadal formulation:

L/V=(tand -m )/(1+m tan(d ))

 

The relationships of these factors are presented in figure #2:

Nadal Derailment Criteria Graph

Figure 2

L=wheel/rail lateral force

V=wheel/rail vertical force

L/V=ratio of wheel/rail forces*

*in the context of the figure above L/V ratios greater than the upper bound are provide potential for derailment

m (Coefficient of Friction) = ratio of tangential to normal wheel/rail force at which slippage occurs.

It is beyond the scope of this bulletin to address all of the issues to be considered when specifying wheel profiles. Rather, this technical bulletin stipulates a boundary value for one parameter, flange angle, that is critical in preventing wheel climb derailments. It is strongly recommended that individuals and organizations adopt or develop wheel profiles practices that assure the minimum sustained flange angle of 72°.

As shown in figure 1, a wheel profile that incorporates a flange angle of 72° provides a significant margin of safety compared to profiles in which the maximum flange angle is approximately 68° to 70°.

V. Suggested Actions

The Task Group strongly suggests that operators of passenger rolling stock consider a quality inspection program to insure that the minimum flange angle discussed above is achieved. This inspection program should consist of the following actions.

- inspection of all check and go/no-go gages for new and recontoured wheels check for wear and distortion due to excessive use and damage

- check wheel contouring machinery:

  For lathes:

a) inspect set-up for slop, backlash and evidence of improper operation, e.g., badly worn cutting tools

b) ensure that templates are appropriate for design and are installed properly ,e.g., no improper tilt

For milling tools:

a) inspect cutting heads for tool breakage or wear

Periodic verification of the accuracy of wheel profiles should be based on a sample of newly manufactured and remachined profiles with a verifiable measuring tool such as a "Mini Prof" device, which has a traceable calibration and a process for routine checking of known machined surfaces.

This audit then should demonstrate conformance to the flange angle minimum described above. The criteria for the audit should be established by the owning authority and traceable records kept. It is recommended that routine repetition of this quality inspection should be conducted by the owning authority.

VI. References

1. Shust, W. C., Thompson, R., and Elkins, J. A., 1998, "Controlled Wheel Climb Derailment Tests Using a Force Measuring Wheelset and AAR's Track Loading Vehicle," Proceedings of 12th International Wheelset Congress, Qingdao, China

2. Shust, W. C., Elkins, J. A., Kalay, S., and ElSibaie, M., 1997, "Wheel Climb Derailment Test Using AAR's Track Loading Vehicle," AAR report R-910, Pueblo, CO.

3. Blade. F .B., 1990, A Review of Literature and Methodology in the Study of Derailments Caused by Excessive Force at Wheel/Rail Interface." AAR Report R-717

4. Weinstock, H., 1984 "Wheel Climb Derailment Criteria For Evaluation of Rail Vehicle Safety," Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, 84-WA/RT-1

5. Sweet, L. M., Karmel, A., and Moy, P., 1980, Wheel Climb Derailment Criteria under Steady Rolling And Dynamic Loading Conditions," Proceedings of 6th IAVSD Symposium on Vehicle Systems Dynamics, Berlin, Swetes, and Zeitlinger B. V., Lisse

6. Gilchrist, A. O., and Brickle, B. V., 1976, "A Re-examination of the Proneness to Derailment of a Railway Wheelset," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 134-141.

7. Nadal, M. J., 1896, "Theore de la Stabilite des Locomotives, part 2," Movement de Lacet, Annales des Mines, 10, 232

Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.