Click here to
download in Adobe PDF format
Table Of Contents
- Message From the Chair
- Committees Outline Progress, 2005 Goals
- Funding, Reauthorization Issues Make Business Hill Visits
a Top Priority
- So You Want to Run: An APTA Leadership Primer
- BMBG, Members Active In Overseas Trade Missions
- Corrections
- Credits
|
Message from the Chair
By Kim Green, GFI Genfare
THE WORK HAS ONLY BEGUN
This
year, APTAs business members are in a great position to help new
APTA Chair Dick White with the theme he has chosen for his tenure: Getting
Down to Business.
For those of you among the 80-plus attendees at our
Annual Business Meeting in Coral Gables, Fla., we certainly
lived up to that phrase. (We also had some fun, too.) In
addition to White, CEOs/general managers Paul Skoutelas
(Pittsburgh), Ron Barnes (Miami) and Mike Mulhern
(Boston) were there to talk about local political funding and
procurement issues.
The full agenda tackled some challenging issues that
we
face this year, such as the future of the (PT)2 campaign,
industry standards development and proposed association
bylaws changes. Some of these issues cut to the very core of
the relationship between the industrys public and private
sectors, and as such they are not going to be resolved
overnight. We continue to make progress and the dialogue
will go on, so stay tuned as we will have some major
announcements for you soon.
In addition, I asked each BMBG committee to prepare
a
background paper that identified key strategic issues for
our membership to discuss. We had some stimulating
debate on these topics, which ranged from how the content
at the major APTA meetings can be more relevant to business
members, to how to engage members of Congress
more effectively, to how we can best put more business
members in leadership positions on APTA committees,
including the Executive Committee. We expect concrete
progress on all these issues this year.
Until we get a bill, however, all these other issues
pale in
comparison to reauthorization. We must get this done soon;
as has been documented in a new brochure funded by our
Activity Fund, many business members are starting to feel
some real pain as a result of the reauthorization delay.
Copies of this brochure, called Delaying TEA 21
Reauthorization: Slowing Down America...and American
Business, will be distributed at the APTA Legislative
Conference.
Speaking of that meeting, mark the dates on your calendars
between March 6 and 8. Once again, the BMBG has
been heavily involved in the planning of this conference. If
you can, please fly in Saturday, when many of the BMBG committees
will be meeting, and stay an extra day, when several should ramp up
into high gear. Once the committee is published, the
candidate, the campaign steering committee and the candidates
supporters (such as members of the BMBG!) should coordinate a
conference call to discuss a strategy, including an analysis of the
Nominating Committee (e.g., the personalities involved, their hot
buttons, influencers, who they know, etc.).
Candidates should write letters to the committee members
explaining their
interest and qualifications for the position. While letter writing will
not win the
campaign, it is an important element. These letters should come from
the
candidate as well as independently from supporters. For the latter,
the candidate
should compile a one-page summary of campaign points and qualifications.
Turney said that he initially placed low emphasis on this aspect of
the
campaign, then discovered that he almost waited too long to write the
letters (hence the importance of having a campaign steering committee
watching and looking for the soft spots!). He found that he was being
conspicuous by his absence without these letters. People
do not vote for
letters; they vote for and support candidates in whom they believe.
But all
elements of the campaign fit together to create a success!
The goal of each candidate should be to secure at least
two believers
on the Nominating Committee, Turney said. The committee goes into its
tough job with an open mind to present a level playing field for all.
However, that does not preclude having a few on the committee that really
believe in the candidate; in fact, absent that, the campaign will not
be a
success, Turney stressed.
Every good campaign has literature. The key piece here
is your resume,
Turney added. You should develop one suitable for this campaign, stating
positions/objectives and relevant experience both in the industry and
in
APTA and other associations.
In addition, candidates need to have letters of support
from peers to the
Nominating Committee, not too many but not too few, either. Letters
of
support should be delivered to committee members within the last few
days prior to the early August meeting. Note that this is a different
set of
letters than discussed above, which are sent earlier in the campaign.
Candidates should also use their work colleagues to spread the word
of
their candidacy. Indeed, everyone that you or your employees come into
contact with should be aware of your intentions.
The Nominating Committee typically meets in early August
to propose a slate of candidates. This is announced 30 days prior to
the actual election (i.e., approval of the slate of candidates), which
takes place at APTAs Annual Meeting. The real election,
then, is the nominating process, because the election is virtually always
a ratification of the proposed slate. Turney stresses that campaigns
should not be so well-planned that they miss opportunities. For example,
Linda Bohlinger was recently elected as chair of the Research &
Technology Committee, which became available unexpectedly. Either way,
the most important message here is go for it. Do not be afraid to throw
your hat in the ring, and if unsuccessful the first time, keep trying.
APTA has campaign guidelines available. This years positions open
to business members are human resources and management and finance.
|
Committees Outline Progress, 2005 Goals
By Cliff Henke, WestStart/CALSTART
Fun and (not necessarily) sun
aside, the BMBG worked
through a busy agenda at its
Annual Business Meeting in Coral
Gables, Fla. The major issues on this
agenda included:
Procurement: The APTA Procurement
Task Force has concluded its
work, handing implementation to a
newly created Procurement Steering
Committee led by Ronald J. Tober
(CEO, Charlotte Area Transit System)
and Bob Brownstein (PB Consult). Its
core responsibility will be to tie
together the various committees that
handle procurement issues within
APTA in order to implement the task
forces objectives more effectively.
(PT)2 Program: The current (PT)2
program ends in June 2006. The
Executive Committee approved the
establishment of a (PT)2 Task Force
under the leadership of Dave Turney,
APTAs vice chair of marketing, and
Rich Bacigalupo, APTAs vice chair of
government affairs, to assess the current
(PT)2 program and develop a successor
program and funding recommendations
to the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors.
Standards: APTA staff briefed the
BMBG on the various APTA-led
standards-setting programs to date,
its current work program and the
proposed dues increase to support
the effort. Action on the proposal by
the Executive Committee and Board
of Directors is planned for their
meetings in March.
In addition to the above issues, the
BMBGs committees outlined the
progress each made in 2004 and their
goals and objectives for 2005. Following
is a brief synopsis of their work:
Business Development: Successful
trade missions to Russia and China
involving many members of the committee
were highlights of 2004. The
committee also deepened the working
relationship with the APTA
Marketing and Communications
Committee (particularly since Turney
is now APTAs vice chair of marketing).
For 2005, the committee is looking
at a trade mission in Mexico in
the spring, as well as the U.S. pavilion
at the UITP Congress and Expo in
Rome in June. Finally, the committee
will continue to further two initiatives
of the BMBG Tactical Plan: the creation
of an industry market study and
a sentinel service for upcoming
procurements.
Government Affairs: The committee
continues to monitor the
progress of TEA 21 reauthorization
and various business member-specific
concerns in the legislation. A
new brochure is being created to
publicize the impact of reauthorizations
delay on the business community
and on the industrys suppliers,
which will be distributed at the
Legislative Conference in March. In
addition, business members will be
meeting with key members of
Congress and their staffs during the weeks of February 14, March 7 (Legislative
Conference week) and April 14 to convey
suppliers concerns.
Outreach: In addition to publishing
four issues of Business in Motion in 2004,
the Outreach Committee merged with the
Liaison Committee because their issues
and work are closely related. In addition,
progress was made on disseminating the
business case to federal officials and
national opinion leaders, an important
responsibility given to the committee in
the BMBG Tactical Plan. In February,
Powell Tate, the public relations firm
retained by the (PT)2 program, launched a
new media campaign titled We Make
Communities Go. It is designed to create
awareness about the business case for
public transportation. The Outreach Committee will continue working with
Powell Tate as the campaign progresses.
Finally, the committee is studying how
business members can be elected to
prominent positions in APTA, building on
the successes of Turneys election and
Linda Bohlingers selection as the new
Research & Technology Committee chair.
Programs: The Programs Committee suggested that, despite the success
of the newly created Executive of the Year Award and black tie dinner at the
APTA Annual Meeting in Atlanta, it would not be repeated in Dallas this year
due to a full agenda in an Expo year. However, procurement-related sessions
will be held at the key meetings this year. The committee is also looking
for Annual Meeting speakers that the BMBG will sponsor, mindful of the need
to maintain the high standard set by Tom Peters in Salt Lake City and Andrew
Young in Atlanta.
Funding, Reauthorization Issues Make Business Hill Visits
a Top Priority
By Art Guzzetti, APTA Staff
In February, the Bush Administration released its Fiscal Year 2006 budget
proposal, which recommends a funding level of $7.781 billion for the federal
transit program, an increase of $134 million, or 1.8%, over the FY 2005 final
appropriation (which itself was a record increase over FY 2004 levels).
This slight increase in transit assistance is part of an overall budget proposal
to cut total non-defense, non-homeland security discretionary funding by 1%,
including overall funding for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The president proposed to zero out all federal subsidies for Amtrak. Instead,
the administration would provide $360 million for the Surface Transportation
Board to maintain existing commuter rail services and freight operations in
the northeast corridor.
These proposals are likely to spark an intense fight for money throughout
the federal budget. At a time when we also still need a multiyear reauthorization
bill, business members will be called upon like never before to help the industry
make the case for increased public transportation investment.
TEA 21 Reauthorization and the Budget
In its February budget request for next year, the Bush Administration proposed
a six-year funding level for TEA 21 reauthorization of $283.9 billion, an
increase of $27.9 billion over the administrations proposal last year.
The DOT budget release states that this figure reflects the emerging
consensus in Congress that was developed in a conference committee in 2004.
The budget proposal gives a preview of the administrations new SAFETEA
reauthorization proposal, but it does not provide much detail. A full proposal
was expected shortly after press time.
The budget proposal begins to set the stage for this years debate over
TEA 21 reauthorization. It proposes to fund the transit program at $49.1 billion
over six years (FY 2004-2009) but, like previous administration reauthorization
proposals, it does not propose to guarantee the portion of the Federal Transit
Administration program that is funded with general funds. The administration
again proposes to eliminate such programs as the Bus and Bus Facilities and
Fixed Guideway Modernization programs and move that funding into the formula
and other programs. Many of these proposals were considered and rejected or
modified by Congress last year.
Transit Security Proposals
Meanwhile, for the first time, President Bush proposed in his FY 2006 Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) budget to create a new security infrastructure
program, called the Targeted Infrastructure Protection (TIP) program, under
which public transportation is eligible for funding. This new program would
provide $600 million in federal grants for the protection of critical infrastructure,
including not only public transportation but also seaports, railways and energy
facilities. Specific allocation of TIP money would be left to the discretion
of the secretary of DHS.
In addition to the TIP program, there are two other programs for which transit
is eligible, also at the discretion of the DHS secretary. The administration
proposed $1 billion for the Urban Area Security Initiative, which would provide
discretionary grants to urban areas and regions; and another $1 billion for
discretionary grants to states to meet national preparedness priorities identified
in state homeland security plans.
Business Member Activities
Accordingly, the Business Member Government Affairs Committee has stepped
up its efforts for a big push this spring. Beginning the week of February
14, business members visited several key members of Congress, particularly
new members of the appropriations, tax-writing and budget committees of the
House and Senate, where action on the legislative agenda for transit will
begin.
During the week of March 6, in conjunction with the APTA Legislative Conference,
and the week of April 11, more business delegations to Capitol Hill are being
organized, this time adding the authorizing committees in both chambers. If
you would like to participate in the remaining visits and have not yet registered,
please do so immediately.
In addition, the BMBG is rolling out two new related information sources.
The first is a new brochure that documents the impact of the delay in reauthorization
on business activity. Tentatively titled Delaying TEA 21 Reauthorization:
Slowing Down America... and American Business, the new brochure assesses
the economic impact that delay in TEA 21 reauthorization has had on the transit
industry, including impacts to shareholders and employees. The brochure uses
such examples as declining order backlogs for buses and railcars, delayed
hiring and/or layoffs, and deferred research and development projects.
In addition, the BMBG helped to launch We Make Communities Go,
a campaign designed to disseminate the ideas of the business case for public
transportation that were developed as part of the BMBG Tactical Plan adopted
in 2003. (PT)2 will use this information campaign in its efforts to interest
major media in the importance of public transportation. Ideally, the campaign
will result in favorable media coverage that will be timed as Congress debates
reauthorization this spring.
Finally, the Legislative Conference will again feature the
Monday morning Hot and Hearty breakfast that will spotlight the
business message. In addition to this session, business members will sponsor
an afternoon event on Capitol Hill. See you in D.C.!
So You Want to Run: An APTA Leadership
Primer
By Franny Yuhas, Orbital TMS, and Cliff Henke, WestStart/CALSTART
An objective of the BMBG Tactical Plan is to put more business
members in key APTA leadership positions, including as chairs of the standing
committees and as the APTA vice chair positions for which supply-siders are
eligible. These latter positions are part of the associations Executive
Committee, where all important APTA decisions are initially made, some subject
to vote of the full Board of Directors.
However, many in APTA do not know how to successfully campaign
for these positions. Notice that we used the word campaign. It
is well chosen because successful candidates develop and execute a carefully
crafted plan for getting elected (or in the case of committee chairs, getting
chosen) for these positions.
To learn more, we turned to Dave Turney, CEO of Digital Recorders,
and the one business member who has run a successful election. In 2003, Turney
was elected as APTAs vice chair of marketing and communications. His
insights are invaluable to anyone aspiring to more responsibility within APTA.
The first thing that Turney stresses is to become involved.
He has made it a priority to become involved both in general APTA activities
and the core activity to which the position being sought relates. However,
above all else, you must be involved, active and visible in a positive context.
Turney is a former chair of the BMBG and, as such, a former Executive Committee
member. In addition, he was one of the co-chairs of the (PT)2 campaign. He
served on many committees and task forces. This visibility is critical for
aspiring APTA leaders, he said. This takes time, but it is vital.
Once you have this experience under your belt and feel that
the timing is right, then you must develop your campaign plan. This should
begin by sounding out a few people you know and respect within the association
during the months prior to the spring before the election, which is held at
the Annual Meeting. By the APTA Legislative Conference of the campaign year,
you should start to make it known more openly and formally.
During the spring, Turney also called at least one influential
general manager in the industry per day for about four weeks straight, stating
that he was running for the position and to invite feedback/thoughts on the
prospect. He also sought the ideas and concerns of these contacts. At the
APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference which is held in May, Turney spent about
20 minutes per day during the conference and each day he could up to
the election at the Annual Meetingletting people know of his interest
and why he was qualified.
By this point, a campaign steering committee should have
formed. This committee should be chaired by a person well known to the candidate,
a person who will tell it like it is. This committee should meet
by telephone at least every two weeks, more often in the latter stages of
the campaign.
Once the Nominating Committee members are known, which is
usually by June 1, the campaign should ramp up into high gear. Once the committee
is published, the candidate, the campaign steering committee and the candidates
supporters (such as members of the BMBG!) should coordinate a conference call
to discuss a strategy, including an analysis of the Nominating Committee (e.g.,
the personalities involved, their hot buttons, influencers, who
they know, etc.).
Candidates should write letters to the committee members
explaining their interest and qualifications for the position. While letter
writing will not win the campaign, it is an important element. These letters
should come from the candidate as well as independently from supporters. For
the latter, the candidate should compile a one-page summary of campaign points
and qualifications.
Turney said that he initially placed low emphasis on this
aspect of the campaign, then discovered that he almost waited too long to
write the letters (hence the importance of having a campaign steering committee
watching and looking for the soft spots!). He found that he was being conspicuous
by his absence without these letters. People do not vote for letters;
they vote for and support candidates in whom they believe. But all elements
of the campaign fit together to create a success!
The goal of each candidate should be to secure at least two
believers on the Nominating Committee, Turney said. The committee
goes into its tough job with an open mind to present a level playing field
for all. However, that does not preclude having a few on the committee that
really believe in the candidate; in fact, absent that, the campaign will not
be a success, Turney stressed.
Every good campaign has literature. The key piece here is
your resume, Turney added. You should develop one suitable for this campaign,
stating positions/objectives and relevant experience both in the industry
and in APTA and other associations.
In addition, candidates need to have letters of support from
peers to the Nominating Committee, not too many but not too few, either. Letters
of support should be delivered to committee members within the last few days
prior to the early August meeting. Note that this is a different set of letters
than discussed above, which are sent earlier in the campaign.
Candidates should also use their work colleagues to spread
the word of their candidacy. Indeed, everyone that you or your employees come
into contact with should be aware of your intentions.
The Nominating Committee typically meets in early August
to propose a slate of candidates. This is announced 30 days prior to the actual
election (i.e., approval of the slate of candidates), which takes place at
APTAs Annual Meeting. The real election, then, is the nominating
process, because the election is virtually always a ratification of the proposed
slate.
Turney stresses that campaigns should not be so well-planned
that they miss opportunities. For example, Linda Bohlinger was recently elected
as chair of the Research & Technology Committee, which became available
unexpectedly. Either way, the most important message here is go for it. Do
not be afraid to throw your hat in the ring, and if unsuccessful the first
time, keep trying.
APTA has campaign guidelines available. This years
positions open to business members are human resources and management and
finance.
BMBG, Members Active In Overseas Trade
Missions
Aslew of APTA business members have been instrumental in
the success of a recent international trade mission to China designed to promote
and win business for U.S. transit products and services. BMBGs Business
Development Committee, led by Al Engel of Systra Consulting and Don Nelson
of the Washington Group, has been actively supporting these government-led
efforts.
The most recent of these missions was to China in November.
Led by FTA Deputy Administrator Robert Jamison, U.S. companies were able to
meet directly with key commercial and government contacts in Beijing, Chongqing
and Chengdu. All three cities are actively exploring expansions of their urban
transportation networks, including BRT, light rail, metro and commuter rail.
Particularly useful was the unique access to transit decision makers in all
levels of the Chinese government responsible for Beijings infrastructure
who must put their citys development plans on a fast track as they prepare
to host the 2008 Summer Olympics.
The committee also hosted FTA officials and some of these
Chinese dignitaries at a very informative industry briefing during the APTA
Annual Meeting in Atlanta. The encounter helped to lay the groundwork for
further dialogue during the trade mission.
This years trade mission to China and the one last
year to Russia have resulted in return visits by foreign transit officials
to the U.S. In November, a 10-member delegation from Moscow Oblast visited
Washington and New York to learn more about U.S. transit and school bus operations.
The group, from suburban Moscow, hosted APTA members on last years trade
mission. Most recently, a delegation from Chongqing, China, one of the cities
on this years trade mission, met with APTA staff to discuss the formation
of a delegation to attend EXPO 2005.
Additional international opportunities will be available
in 2005. These include the chance to participate in the U.S. Pavilion in City
Transport, the exhibition attached to the UITPs biennial congress, which
will be held in Rome the first week of June. Space is still available to attend
the U.S. Pavilion. Contact Fran Hooper at fhooper@apta.com
for more information.
 |
| A trade mission to China in November took APTA business members to Beijing,
Chongquing and Chendu to learn more about business opportunities. In addition
to meeting transit providers and potential partners in each city, the
delegation also met with officials from Chinas Ministry of Construction
(which has responsibility for transit construction), Ministry of Railroads
and Ministry of Science and Technology. APTA past chair George Dixon and
FTA Deputy Administrator Robert Jamison led the trade mission. |
|
CORRECTIONS
Following is the corrected text for the New Member Profile for Cimage,
which ran in error in the January 2005 issue of Business in Motion:
Founded in 1990, Cimage NovaSoft is a supplier
of enterprise content management
(ECM) solutions to industry and government.
Its ECM solutions comprise imaging,
records management, document management,
workflow and collaboration software
that provide:
- Creation, capture and secure storage of
information.
- Retrieval, viewing, collaboration and distribution
of information.
- Control of document changes for secure,
automated, traceable processes.
- Management of document revisions.
Cimage is used for the management and
distribution of document-based information
to ensure regulatory compliance and
increase productivity. Some of the companys
customers include BART, the
London Underground and GE Railcar
Systems.
|
|
Business In Motion
The official newsletter of the American Public Transportation Association's
Business Members
Chair
Kim Green,
GFI Genfare
Chair, Outreach Committee/Publisher
Cliff Henke, NABI
Associate Publisher
Frank Di Giacomo,
METRO Magazine
Editor
Leslie Davis,
METRO Magazine
Graphic Designer
Joni Hutton,
Bobit Business Media
APTA Staff Advisor
Fran Hooper
Ensure a positive R.O.I.
Get active in APTA. To receive Business in Motion electronically, email Fran Hooper at
fhooper@apta.com.
|
Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.